Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Local drug war

Here is a press release Police Chief Sean Wallace sent out, which is what he said to a state senate committee last week. They want to make the drug pseudoephedrine a prescription only medication. This is the essential drug in allergy medicine that you can now get without a prescription.
A box of this costs around $5, and it is used for making meth. it is also used by people who have allergies.
If it were a prescription only med, you would have to have a doctor  visit and get a prescription, so the cost - including the doctors visit, would be around $50 if you dont have insurance, and probably $15-$20 if you do have insurance.
I know this drug is abused to make illicit drugs, but ... this is punishing the citizenry for the actions of a few. Wallace feels this would prevent meth-makers from getting the drug. So how hard would it be for them to go get a doctors prescription? All they would have to do is sneeze a bit for the doc.... and pay a little more than they pay now...
I do at least agree with Wallace that we need to let our state senators know what we think of this bill.
:)
below is what Wallace sent out:



I am in full support of  SB131which proposes to make pseudoephedrine a prescription only drug.  Chief Dan Parker of Winfield Police Department and I are both located in Cowley County and our agencies are part of a countywide drug task force along with Sheriff D uld add that affect the safety, health, and the crime rate of our perspective cities.

When pseudoephedrine was first required to be kept behind the counter in July of 2004, we saw a drop in Methamphetamine labs and sales in our county.  However, the “tunnel vision” addiction of Meth led the users to problem solve ways to acquire pseudoephedrine in spite of the restrictions and resume methamphetamine production.  The method “smurphs” are using to finance the purchase of pseudoephedrine has caused our theft and burglary rate to sore.  The “smurphs” steal scrap metal, copper from air conditioners, and commit other burglaries and thefts to acquire the funds to purchase pseudoephedrine legitimately.  The “Smurphs” then fan out to the various stores in our jurisdiction and buy their limit of pseudoephedrine and meth production continues.  These methods used by “smurphs” have increased methamphetamine production in Cowley Co. and now 30% of the drug crime we investigate is methamphetamine related. 

The current controls on pseudoephedrine may be working statewide but are not working in southeast Kansas and further steps are needed to curb meth production.   Logs are great, but many pharmacies employee minimum wage workers at their counters and they are not diligent to verify ID cards and driver’s licenses.  Corporate pharmacies keep electronic logs but like all transactions at these type of stores, transactions are done with electronic readers and signature pads that the clerk never views so purchasers of pseudoephedrine can write anything.  If Kansas strengthens the current restrictions to include requiring pseudoephedrine  to be on the same computerized tracking network it still will not prevent “smurphs” from funding their efforts by theft and from going out in force and buying up their limit of pseudoephedrine at the over the counter drug providers in our jurisdiction.  If pseudoephedrine is prescription only, no amount of thefts and mobilization on their part will allow them to obtain the product. 

16 comments:

  1. "The method “smurphs” are using to finance the purchase of pseudoephedrine has caused our theft and burglary rate to sore"

    Did he really spell 'soar' s-o-r-e???

    ReplyDelete
  2. This seems to be a SOAR* subject.

    Why punish those of us who follow the law? My family suffers from allergies, and it would not be in our interest to have to visit our doctor every time we need medicine. If you want to change a law, why not one of the laws that ties your hands behind your back in dealing with these meth heads, so they are not right back on the street a month later? Don't change laws that will hurt taxpayers.

    Instead, why not require that pharmacies keep better records, and lists of known drug offenders, and make it illegal to sell to anyone on the list or to not check ID, much as is done with alcohol now.

    In my mind, if you make it that much harder to obtain the medicine, the "Smurfs" (not Smurphs) will just start breaking into pharmacies or drug warehouses, or they will find another way to make meth.

    *(spelled wrong on purpose)

    ReplyDelete
  3. While I understand the Cheifs position concerning tighter regulation of pseudoephedrine. I don't believe the answer lies in making it a prescription drug!

    There is plenty of problems with the abuse of prescription drugs and they are supposed to be regulated!

    What do you regulate next Anhydrous Ammonia,
    starting fluid, coffee filters?

    You would think with all the living examples of the devastating effects both mental and physical of using meth that would be enough to deter or destroy some of the demand for that drug!

    Maybe the real answers lie in finding the reasons people are willing to subject themselves to the use of drugs as a cure all?

    You might even want to start with Ritalin!

    Maybe they were taught to be ADDICTS at an early age?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe the real answers lie in finding the reasons people are willing to subject themselves to the use of drugs as a cure all?
    >>
    YES !
    That is what I have been saying.
    You might even think about how most of us "need" a cup of coffee in the morning.
    And of course there is the blatant hypocrisy of glorifying alcohol, which is some cases is just as devastating as meth.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Society has no problem with people getting drunk, but hates people who do drugs.

    Hypocrites.

    ReplyDelete
  6. JJ said, "And of course there is the blatant hypocrisy of glorifying alcohol, which is some cases is just as devastating as meth."

    I would argue that alcohol has destroyed more families, and cost more to society than meth ever will.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When was the last time you heard of someone breaking into a home or car for money so they could by a beer, Chief did say meth does cause a lot of theft crime for just that reason. again why should the allergy sufferers have to pay for a doctors pres. just because of a few meth heads. I for one am NOT for and do NOT believe in drug use of any kind and I feel part of the problem is the court system. what good does it do to arrest the meth heads them have the courts just turn them loose with a slap on the wrist. some serious jail time and very heavy fines might curb part of this but as long as there are meth heads out there the cycle will continue. sorry i'll stop ranting.D

    ReplyDelete
  8. Don't look now, but the jails/prisons are FULL. More fines...yes! That's a plan..Don't look now but these folks have NO money. Goodness, there's folks on the books w/ 1000's of $$ worth of fines. (that will NEVER be collected)

    What's the answer? IDK, but the old "lock 'em up"..."3 strikes" idea never did work. Prisons don't reform people. It makes them worse. Fines is like trying to get blood from a turnip.
    To start with, let's go back to prohibition. No alcohol, no drugs, no prostitutes. There is a way to stop drugs. Just institute capital punishment for all drug pushers.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Don't look now, but the jails/prisons are FULL. More fines...yes! That's a plan..Don't look now but these folks have NO money. Goodness, there's folks on the books w/ 1000's of $$ worth of fines. (that will NEVER be collected)

    Well you have a valid point!

    But if you haven't noticed it is the youth (minors) and many of the underpriviledged/poor who they really try to get to involved in the drug trade!

    Why do think they prey on the YOUTH?

    Why are there so many youth without the proper guidance/direction and or mentors?

    Somebody is going to teach them something be it right or be it WRONG!

    Porverbs 4: 18-19

    18. The path of righteousness is like the first gleam of dawn, shinning even brighter till the full light of day.

    19. But the way of the wicked is like deep darkness; they do not know what makes them stumble.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Arizona's Sheriff will donate some tents [a summer camp, [no prison stigma]road gangs [organized recreation]. Ever notice how our "Chief" doesn't mind spending "your" money.

    ReplyDelete
  11. with the health benefits they have as city employees, the requirement of obtaining a prescription won't affect them, but it sure as hell will affect those who have many of the private sector insurance coverages, and nail them even further when the uninsured have to visit a doctor, then leave the bill unpaid. Even for those uninsured who legitimately attempt to pay the bill, just imagine the burden it will place on the families already struggling with low paying jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Well it appears common sense has prevailed as SB 131 was shot down today!

    Gotta think of the big picture folks...requiring prescriptions for the more effective cold/allergy medicines would only wreak more havoc in the already polluted health care system!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hopefully the legislature is settling down in the last month and going to look at the real issues, rather than these band wagon, toot your horn ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "When was the last time you heard of someone breaking into a home or car for money so they could by a beer,"

    I'll give you that. Don't think many pot heads are breaking into peoples houses either. My only point was, that alcoholism has destroyed many families, and cost businesses in lost productivity...

    ReplyDelete
  15. I am willing to bet more beer is bought with funds from stolen scrap metal as compared to meth.

    ReplyDelete